|
discussion.archive.0009
|
Subject: |
Re: Animation Collaboration |
|
From: |
Rob <rmatthews@clockwork-games.com> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Sep 2000 17:54:51 +0100 |
|
User-Agent: |
Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) |
> From: "Thomas Ortega II" <lord_bron@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: Discussion@Softimage.COM
> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 08:12:33 PDT
> To: Discussion@Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: Animation Collaboration
>
> It's definitely free access. I may eventually move to a sponsor type
> system, but it would be very low key, not huge flashing banner ads.
>
> As for the no pop ups, I was stuck on that one. When viewing the project in
> its various stages and sections, I figured it might be easier to put up
> links to images, text documents, short flicks, etc. This way you could
> browse in a very fast manner, and have to wait only for those "items" that
> you click on to view. I figured keeping the, let's say image in a separate
> pop-up view would enable you to view the image while reading various
> people's comments, writing your own comments, comparing two versions, etc.
> Otherwise if it was imbedded in the pages, the image would have to reload
> every single time you performed any of the above items. I suppose I could
> use frames, but I'm not a big fan of them.
Ah we seem to have crossed wires, I have been informed by my some of my more
"open-minded" colleagues that there exists on the internet sites where the
the promise of free "skin flicks" is made, on following the link the viewer
is first greeted with 30 banners offering liaison's with "teen lolitas" for
$19.95 a month then they get a 200meg core dump as Netscape dies while
trying to open another 35 "popup" browser windows. So I've been told that
is, it would certainly reduce the random cries of "How much!" and
"motherf###er!" in my office if certain design features were removed from
said websites.
> As for the personal image issue, I don't see why not. Granted I don't think
> any of ours (except for Porl's, of course) would be quite as funny looking
> as those in the link below. =)
Well the *dude* forth from the bottom reminds me of somebody here, and every
office must have had a similar looking *dude* to the *dude* in the Richmond
cap at some point in time.
> - Tommy2
Rob
www.clockwork-games.co.uk
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo@Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe discussion
- References:
- Re: Animation Collaboration Thomas Ortega II - 2000/09/19 11:14
|